![]() It’s also faster somehow than Pro Tools AudioSuite at 96k. While AudioSuite combined with playlists isn’t bad, my REAPER method is way better for a few reasons. When I first moved from Pro Tools to REAPER for my analog play/capture, I was worried about REAPER not having AudioSuite and playlists like Pro Tools because I thought that to be the best way to spot repair little sections in my analog play/capture. I don’t know about other DAWs but REAPER has the option to define a primary external audio editor, as well as a secondary external audio editor if needed. It would be great to see that added to WaveLab as well as a way to send copes of selected clips or clip sections to RX6 standalone for repair and then have them available in WaveLab montage on another take/playlist so you can easily flip between the original sound or your repair work which is also handy if you need to try another approach to that spot at a later time.ĭo tell! I haven’t been able to get RX Connect to work with either Cubase or WaveLab (or indeed any other application) because it looks in the wrong place to load the RX standalone. If anything, WaveLab really needs something like Pro Tools Audio Suite which I think Cubase may have just added. is really really clumsy compared to the way I’m using REAPER and RX as a team. ![]() Overall I think processing small or large sections of audio in WaveLab using plugins in the global master section and managing their bypass state etc. ![]() Using just the VST plugin versions leaves something to desired and while I haven’t tried it lately, I do remember some potential issues at the edit points regarding click/pops etc. Sort of true but after working with REAPER with RX6 set as REAPER’s primary audio editor, I strongly prefer having the ability to send bits and pieces of audio (or entire songs) to RX6 standalone app for better visual feedback when I need to make edits. Note that the RX plugins all work very well within WaveLab, so as far as restoration goes, you can have the best of both worlds. ![]() The bottom line? Does Restore Rig hold a candle to RX 6 for analog restoration? I’d have to say no, at least not yet, however the bulk of my time is spent in WaveLab (as my “home” environment) with the RX plugins, and I rarely use the RX editor. That said, the new “inpainting” is superb! IMHO if your focus is on spectral edit and you already have RX, then WaveLab probably won’t bring much to the table, whereas WaveLab’s spectral edit is now good enough that it makes an additional purchase of RX unnecessary for those who don’t already have it. For vinyl work however, you most notably don’t get De-crackle until you upgrade to either Standard or Advanced.Ī feature much improved in WaveLab 9.5 is spectral editing, which is now comparable with RX, however, everyone has different ways of working so it really is down to spending time with each to see which one best suits your workflow. There is now also RX Elements, which is occasionally on sale for as little as €29, which will give you De-click, De-hum, De-clip, Voice Denoise and others as VST3 plugins. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |